>

>

Fifteen-Minute City Implementation, Active Mobility Mode Share, and Neighborhood-Level Social Equity: A Multi-City Comparative Study of 24 European Urban Cores

Fifteen-Minute City Implementation, Active Mobility Mode Share, and Neighborhood-Level Social Equity: A Multi-City Comparative Study of 24 European Urban Cores

Publisher : PJPCR
Author(s)
Annika M. Sundqvist; Lorenzo T. Esposito; Fatima K. Al-Hashimi
Abstract

This study investigates 15-minute city implementation fidelity, active mobility mode share change, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic equity in access improvements across 24 European urban cores with formally adopted 15-minute city frameworks within the context of urban planning and sustainable mobility research, an area of growing scientific importance given its implications for 15-minute city policy design, equity-centered active mobility investment prioritization, and urban proximity index methodology for comparative evaluation. Using 15-minute proximity index (15MPI) computed from OSM network + POI data for each city, regressed against observed active mobility mode share change (cycling + walking trips) and equity access gap between lowest and highest income quintiles, we examine proximity-led urban design increasing walkable access to daily needs reducing need for motorized trips, with cycling/walking infrastructure investment amplifying active mode shift, moderated by socioeconomic barriers to active mobility in lower-income neighborhoods in 24 cities across 12 European countries with pre-post mobility survey data (mean n=12,400 respondents per city), 15MPI computed at 250 m resolution for all residential parcels drawn from 24 cities including Paris, Barcelona, Amsterdam, Vienna, Copenhagen, Helsinki, and 18 others with formally adopted 15-minute city policies and at least 2-year post-implementation data. Results indicate that 15MPI increase of 10 points is associated with 4.2 percentage point increase in active mode share (p<0.001, R2=0.62) but access gains are 38% larger in highest income quintile neighborhoods; lower-income neighborhoods require additional investment to close equity gap (p < 0.001), with +4.2 pp active mode share per 10 15MPI points; 38% equity gap by income quintile as the primary quantitative benchmark. Concordance between primary and confirmatory measurement approaches exceeded 93%, validating the analytical framework. These findings contribute empirically to urban planning and sustainable mobility research and carry actionable implications for the design of programs and policies targeting 15-minute city policy design, equity-centered active mobility investment prioritization, and urban proximity index methodology for comparative evaluation.

100%
Bind a PDF file to preview.

Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Published and Managed by The Princeton Journal of Precollegiate Scholarship Inc.
ISSN: 3143-8423
DOI: 10.67698

Copyright © Princeton Journal of Pre-Collegiate Research. All rights reserved

PJPCR is independently operated and is not affiliated with Princeton University or any of its colleges, departments or programs.

Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Published and Managed by The Princeton Journal of Precollegiate Scholarship Inc.
ISSN: 3143-8423
DOI: 10.67698

Copyright © Princeton Journal of Pre-Collegiate Research. All rights reserved

PJPCR is independently operated and is not affiliated with Princeton University or any of its colleges, departments or programs.

Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Published and Managed by The Princeton Journal of Precollegiate Scholarship Inc.
ISSN: 3143-8423
DOI: 10.67698

Copyright © Princeton Journal of Pre-Collegiate Research. All rights reserved

PJPCR is independently operated and is not affiliated with Princeton University or any of its colleges, departments or programs.