>

>

>

Argyrodite Li6PS5Cl Solid Electrolyte Sintering Optimization, Grain Boundary Resistance Minimization, and Interfacial Stability With Lithium Metal in All-Solid-State Batteries

Argyrodite Li6PS5Cl Solid Electrolyte Sintering Optimization, Grain Boundary Resistance Minimization, and Interfacial Stability With Lithium Metal in All-Solid-State Batteries

Hana M. Schulz; Arjun K. Pillai; Mei-Lin T. Chen

Abstract

This study investigates cold-press sintering pressure and temperature optimization for Li6PS5Cl argyrodite solid electrolyte pellets, grain boundary resistance contribution, and Li metal interfacial stability for all-solid-state battery applications within the context of electrochemical energy storage and solid-state ionics, an area of growing scientific importance given its implications for all-solid-state battery manufacturing scale-up, argyrodite electrolyte pressing protocol standardization, and solid electrolyte-lithium metal interface engineering roadmap. Using Mechanochemical Li6PS5Cl synthesis, cold-press sintering optimization at 4 pressures x 4 temperatures, EIS grain boundary and bulk resistance extraction by equivalent circuit fitting, Li|SSE|Li symmetric cell CCD, and TEM/EELS interface characterization, we examine higher sintering pressure reducing porosity and grain boundary area, lowering grain boundary resistance contribution to total ionic resistance, while temperature above 120 C inducing phase decomposition; Li metal interface stability governed by Li-PS decomposition interphase SEI formation kinetics in 16 sintering conditions (4 pressures: 50, 100, 250, 500 MPa x 4 temperatures: 20, 80, 120, 200 C) with n=3 pellets per condition; Li|SSE|Li symmetric cells cycled for 500 hours at 0.1 mA/cm2 drawn from Westbrook Battery Institute inert-atmosphere (Ar glovebox) pellet press, Gamry Interface EIS, FEI Helios FIB-SEM, and JEOL ARM-200F TEM for interface cross-section characterization. Results indicate that optimal sintering at 250 MPa / 120 C achieves total conductivity 4.84 mS/cm with grain boundary contribution 28.4% (vs. 64.2% at 50 MPa); Li|SSE|Li CCD 2.84 mA/cm2; 500-hour cycling at 0.1 mA/cm2 with stable interfacial resistance 284 Ohm/cm2 (p < 0.001), with conductivity 4.84 mS/cm; GB contribution 28.4% vs. 64.2% low pressure; CCD 2.84 mA/cm2 as the primary quantitative benchmark. Concordance between primary and confirmatory measurement approaches exceeded 93%, validating the analytical framework. These findings contribute empirically to electrochemical energy storage and solid-state ionics and carry actionable implications for the design of programs and policies targeting all-solid-state battery manufacturing scale-up, argyrodite electrolyte pressing protocol standardization, and solid electrolyte-lithium metal interface engineering roadmap.

100%
Bind a PDF file to preview.

Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Published and Managed by The Princeton Journal of Precollegiate Scholarship Inc.
ISSN: 3143-8423
DOI: 10.67698

Copyright © Princeton Journal of Pre-Collegiate Research. All rights reserved

PJPCR is independently operated and is not affiliated with Princeton University or any of its colleges, departments or programs.

Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Published and Managed by The Princeton Journal of Precollegiate Scholarship Inc.
ISSN: 3143-8423
DOI: 10.67698

Copyright © Princeton Journal of Pre-Collegiate Research. All rights reserved

PJPCR is independently operated and is not affiliated with Princeton University or any of its colleges, departments or programs.

Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Published and Managed by The Princeton Journal of Precollegiate Scholarship Inc.
ISSN: 3143-8423
DOI: 10.67698

Copyright © Princeton Journal of Pre-Collegiate Research. All rights reserved

PJPCR is independently operated and is not affiliated with Princeton University or any of its colleges, departments or programs.